Pacing Precision – Mathew Whitaker at the Dragon’s Eye 2025 1st Marathon Distance

🎯 Objective

To complete a trail marathon with strong pacing, negative splits, and a confident finish—demonstrating Mathew’s growing endurance and race-day maturity.

🏃 Athlete Profile – Mathew Whitaker

  • Race: Dragon’s Eye Endurance Race
  • Location: Waverley, England
  • Date: Sunday, 14 September 2025
  • Distance: 42.20 km
  • Moving Time: 3:48:00
  • Elapsed Time: 3:51:36
  • Average Pace: 5:24/km
  • Elevation Gain: 253 m
  • Calories Burned: 3,134 kcal
  • Conditions: Cool and cloudy
  • Device: Garmin Forerunner 245
  • Shoes: Not recorded
  • Top Results:
    • Marathon – 3:51:28
    • 30K – 2:43:25
    • Half-Marathon – 1:48:58
    • 20K – 1:43:26

📊 Pacing Breakdown – Mathew Whitaker

KM 1–10 (Settling In) Average Pace: ~5:35/km Notes: Mathew opened with control, adjusting to terrain and elevation. Early pacing showed patience and aerobic efficiency.

KM 11–21 (Mid-Race Rhythm) Average Pace: ~5:20/km Notes: Found a strong rhythm, with splits between 5:12–5:25/km. KM 16 (5:12/km) and KM 18 (5:15/km) reflected smooth effort and fueling balance.

KM 22–32 (Acceleration Phase) Average Pace: ~5:05/km Notes: Mathew surged with confidence—KM 21–24 all under 5:12/km, including a standout 4:56/km in KM 21. This section showed strength and mental focus.

KM 33–42 (Final Push) Average Pace: ~5:00/km Notes: Closed with negative splits—KM 32–42 included multiple sub-5:00/km efforts (KM 32: 4:52/km, KM 36–37: 4:57/km, 4:55/km). A powerful finish that capped a well-executed race.

❤️ Heart Rate & Effort

Estimated HR Zone: Aerobic threshold to tempo Insight: Mathew maintained a strong aerobic base with controlled surges. His cadence (159 spm) and average HR (170 bpm) suggest efficient form and sustainable effort.

💡 Key Insights

  • Negative Split Execution: Mathew’s final 10K was his fastest—evidence of smart pacing and strong reserves.
  • Terrain Adaptation: Despite elevation shifts, he maintained form and rhythm, especially in the second half.
  • Effort Awareness: His pacing reflects intuitive regulation—surging when ready, holding back when needed.
  • Race-Day Confidence: The final 5K showed not just fitness, but belief—he knew he could finish fast and did.

🧩 Coaching Applications

  • Matthew’s splits teaches negative split strategy and effort-based pacing
  • Reinforces the value of mid-race patience and late-race surges
  • Models how trail marathons benefit from terrain awareness and cadence control
  • Celebrates strong finishes 
  • Encourages athletes to trust their pacing plan and finish with intent
Scroll to Top
WordPress Cookie Plugin by Real Cookie Banner